# 📄 Case Brief Example
---
## Case Citation
* **Case Name:** Marbury v. Madison
* **Court:** Supreme Court of the United States
* **Date of Decision:** 1803
* **Citation:** 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
---
## Facts of the Case
* **Summary:** In the final days of John Adams' presidency, he appointed several justices of the peace. However, the commissions were not delivered before Thomas Jefferson took office. Jefferson ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison, to withhold the commissions, and William Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to compel their delivery.
---
## Legal Issue(s)
* **Primary Issue:** Does Marbury have a right to his commission, and does the Supreme Court have the authority to enforce its delivery?
---
## Holding
* **Decision:** Marbury was entitled to his commission, but the Court could not compel Madison to deliver it because the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Court authority to issue writs of mandamus, was unconstitutional.
---
## Reasoning
* **Rationale:** The Court held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any law conflicting with it is invalid. The Judiciary Act of 1789 extended the Court's original jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution permitted, rendering it void.
---
## Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
* **Concurring Opinion:** None
* **Dissenting Opinion:** None
---
## Case Significance
* **Impact:** This case established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the authority to strike down unconstitutional laws, significantly shaping the role of the judiciary in the American legal system.
---
**Note:** Use this example as a guide to structure and organize your own case briefs for study or legal analysis.
📄 Case Brief Example
Case Citation
- Case Name: Marbury v. Madison
- Court: Supreme Court of the United States
- Date of Decision: 1803
- Citation: 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Facts of the Case
- Summary: In the final days of John Adams' presidency, he appointed several justices of the peace. However, the commissions were not delivered before Thomas Jefferson took office. Jefferson ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison, to withhold the commissions, and William Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to compel their delivery.
Legal Issue(s)
- Primary Issue: Does Marbury have a right to his commission, and does the Supreme Court have the authority to enforce its delivery?
Holding
- Decision: Marbury was entitled to his commission, but the Court could not compel Madison to deliver it because the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Court authority to issue writs of mandamus, was unconstitutional.
Reasoning
- Rationale: The Court held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any law conflicting with it is invalid. The Judiciary Act of 1789 extended the Court's original jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution permitted, rendering it void.
Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
- Concurring Opinion: None
- Dissenting Opinion: None
Case Significance
- Impact: This case established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the authority to strike down unconstitutional laws, significantly shaping the role of the judiciary in the American legal system.
Note: Use this example as a guide to structure and organize your own case briefs for study or legal analysis.